Announcements

10 Year Anniverary & New Releases Winners: Carrie Fancett Pagels' Butterfly Cottage - Melanie B, Dogwood Plantation - Patty H R, Janet Grunst's winner is Connie S., Denise Weimer's Winner is Kay M., Naomi Musch's winner is Chappy Debbie, Angela Couch - Kathleen Maher, Pegg Thomas Beverly D. M. & Gracie Y., Christy Distler - Kailey B., Shannon McNear - Marilyn R.

Monday, July 11, 2016

Gaming in Colonial Times

French earthenware tray & board game, 1720-50 (Wiki)
Practically since time began, people have sought various ways to entertain themselves in between the work of finding food, clothing, and shelter. Popular opinion of entertainment, however, has varied. Three guesses on which well-known colonial-era leader said this (no cheating!):
Almost all these pursuits of chance [i.e., of human industry] produce something useful to society. But there are some which produce nothing, and endanger the well-being of the individuals engaged in them or of others depending on them. Such are games with cards, dice, billiards, etc. And although the pursuit of them is a matter of natural right, yet society, perceiving the irresistible bent of some of its members to pursue them, and the ruin produced by them to the families depending on these individuals, consider it as a case of insanity, quoad hoc, step in to protect the family and the party himself, as in other cases of insanity, infancy, imbecility, etc., and suppress the pursuit altogether, and the natural right of following it ...
No, this wasn't one of the Puritans, although they frowned on "trivial pursuits" as well. As Wikipedia tells us,
When the Governor William Bradford discovered a group of non-Puritans playing stool-ball, pitching the bar, and pursuing other sports in the streets on Christmas Day, 1622, he confiscated their implements, reprimanded them, and told them their devotion for the day should be confined to their homes.
Here on Colonial Quills, we've learned about children's games and that some were even used as educational tools, but what pursuits did adults enjoy?

The Family Remy (Januarius Zick, c. 1776): various parlor activities
The first quote cites cards, billiards, and dice. The use of playing cards dates back at least a millennia ago, in China, in variations that can be tracked forward to our modern game of poker. Colonial-era Germans and French played a forerunner of poker (called "Pochen" or "Poque," both developed from a game called Primera, according to Zynga). Whist, loo (formerly lanterloo), and cribbage were also very popular--although not always, as is emphasized by various sources, in mixed or polite company. One interesting thing is that historical playing cards were printed with only "spots" or pictures, not the easy-reference system of today with the number/letter and suit in the corners.

Billiards, of course, is the forerunner of our modern game of pool, dating in a recognizable form since at least the 15th century. Did you know that the green fabric favored since at least the 17th century probably originated to simulate the color of grass, but scientifically allows longer play with less eyestrain?

The use of dice dates back as far as we have recorded history, with pieces carved from bone, ivory, wood, and stone. Apparently--just to warn anyone who decides to do further research--there's a long history of variants having suggestive or bawdy themes, as well. (The same applies to playing cards.)

Outdoor pursuits included variations on bowling or ninepins, where the object was to knock down all the pins but the center one. That seems a lot harder than modern bowling, but it probably shouldn't surprise me that our colonial forebears had more patience for the finer points of gaming. One source I consulted on colonial-era games (not a clue how accurate some of this list is) includes a description of parlor games that sound tedious and convoluted at best, pointless at worst.

We know that board games have been a perennial favorite, as well. Chess, checkers, mancala, backgammon, and others were popular--perhaps more so amongst those who had the luxury of "idleness," but the human need for occasional recreation is universal, so I suspect only the most austere refrained completely from these kinds of pursuits. It's hard to say how long chess itself has been regarded as a valuable tool for training the mind in strategy.

So who was our mystery commentator above? That would be Thomas Jefferson, in Thoughts on Lotteries (1826). He happened to approve of raffles and lotteries, by the way, just not more "useless" gambling. :)

4 comments:

  1. Thanks for sharing Shannon. Very interesting.
    Blessings,Tina

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad you thought so! :) Thanks for always stopping by.

      Delete
  2. Interesting! I love learning all these cool facts. Thank you. :-)

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for commenting, please check back for our replies!