April Tea Party Winners

Six Year Blog Anniversary WINNERS: Carla Gade - Pattern for Romance audiobooks go to Andrea Stephens and Megs Minutes and winner of Love's Compas is Terressa Thornton, PEGG THOMAS's signed copy of The Pony Express Romance Collection is Debra Smith, Janet Grunst's debut book goes to Kathleen Maher, Carrie Fancett Pagels' winner's choice goes to: Connie Saunders, Denise Weimer's print winner of, Angela Couch's winner's choice goes to Susan Johnson, Debra E. Marvin reader's choice of any of her novellas or a paperback of Saguaro Sunset novella -- Teri DiVincenzo and Lynne Feurstein, Jennifer Hudson Taylor's "For Love or Country" go to: Lucy Reynolds, Bree Herron and Mary Ellen Goodwin, Shannon McNear's winners are Becky Dempsey for Pioneer Christmas and Michelle Hayes for Most Eligible Bachelor, Roseanna White's winner for Love Finds You in Annapolis is Becky Smith.

Friday, January 13, 2017

Fingerless Gloves



Lady and the Veil by Alexander Roslin 1768
Fingerless gloves have become a fad with the invention of the smartphone, right? Not quite. Not even close. tweet this

Fingerless gloves - often called mitts - were popular in Colonial America. Generally made of kid leather or silk, lace was sometimes used in the hotter climates or seasons. The gloves would cover the hand and wrist, perhaps even the forearm.

While certainly a fashion statement among the upper classes, who adorned them with embroidery and pearls, these mitts were also functional. Colonial houses were notoriously drafty and difficult to heat. Mitts allowed for warmth while keeping the fingers free to move. Some were true gloves with the finger tips missing, while other were more like today's mittens but stopped short of the fingers.

Late 18th Century Matron
Men wore fingerless gloves for hunting and for doing work that involved using their fingers for precision, such as bookkeeping or typesetting.

Women wore them for sewing and other needlework, for tending to the children, and for cooking. Upper-class ladies would wear the more mitten form, thus allowing their rings to show.

Gloves have been in fashion - even at least one type of fingerless glove - since ancient Rome. They have vacillated between function and fashion and still do. Our Colonial ancestors valued them for both reasons.

Next time you see someone tapping on their smartphone while wearing a pair of fingerless gloves, smile and remember that their ancestors had it right first.




PeggThomas.com

Debut story will release in April 2017 from Barbour - Colonial story coming in January 2018

8 comments:

  1. They never made sense from a warmth factor. My fingers get too cold. My office mate and I have tried them at work. �� But I love the historical look of them!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But the lady could still do her needlework while wearing them!

      Delete
  2. My youngest daughter, 25, loves the fingerless gloves and her older sister thinks she's immature for wearing them. I need to copy her in on this lesson to teach her a lesson. I think they are cute and used to wear a pair myself at work to use the computer. Very interesting lesson.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I knitted MANY pairs for co-workers in the office. By keeping your wrists/palms warm, you keep the blood supply to your fingers warmer too. Easier to type.

      Delete
  3. I remember seeing them in period movies. My husband has a pair for hunting. It makes sense concerning keeping your hands warm while keeping the fingers free for doing tasks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Many of the hunting fingers gloves have a mitten-like flap that covers the fingers while not in use on the gun. Clever.

      Delete
  4. My daughter has crocheted me a couple pairs of fingerless gloves. I love them.

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for commenting, please check back for our replies!